- The first one keeps the exponent vector of each smooth number (impractical due to the huge memory needed to keep the vectors).
- The second one sieves at an interval centralized at sqrt(N); according to my testing, this has no visible improvements over the standard one.
- The last version which is the same as the first one but which uses only a binary exponent vector (saving one bit for each prime in the base) for the smooth numbers.
Popular Posts
-
Looking for the awesome Twitter Archive Eraser? It has a new home now, d ownload it from: https://delete.tweets.tools (previous url http...
-
I wanted to use Vigenere as the cipher for the 3rd message on the competition to win a domain name , but changed my mind due to the number...
-
Installing custom certificates on Android was a real headache and a difficult issue for a lot of people, as for me, I was not able to connec...
-
Stealing passwords using XSS has been discovered long time ago, it mainly targeted the Firefox browser. Today in a boring afternoon weekend,...
-
Working on some Amazon EC2 benchmarks I run through few problems of having my processes to run with a high time precision where a more than...
-
SVN is a must have for managing projects and keeping them proper, with a history of changes, what should be done when 2 versions of the same...
-
Exactly a year ago today I added some analytics to Twitter Archive Eraser to get some insights on how it is used and what kind of load it i...